RSS Feed for This PostCurrent Article

House Democrats on the Fence for Health Vote

I found this article from the Republican Whip office site, in going through it I sorted out the reasons why they are going to hold things up.   I also went to each Representatives site to see what they say, some had issued press releases sometime today and some were very unclear.  I thought I would share with you what we found.  

Let me be clear!   KILL THIS BILL!!!!!   Tell your Representatives even today Saturday that they need to VOTE NO!!!  

VOTE NO FOR PELOSICARE! Contact your member of Congress at 202-224-3121

You can find their phone numbers and addresses to their local offices, which go visit, go let them know.    www.house.gov??????  Whatever works for you.   There will be protesters Saturday on the House Steps letting them know to Kill the Bill and also visiting them as well from what I understand.   Please keep up the effort but also what what the other hand is doing, when there is chaos, something happens we don’t need to happen and since this is ramping up, we have to watch that other hand.  

Dem Whip Check
Posted By Brian Patrick :: November 6, 2009
NOTE: Despite unemployment at its highest level since 1983, Speaker Pelosi continues to push her Caucus to pass a trillion dollar government takeover that will replace Americans’ health care. As of today, at least 69 Democrats have expressed opposition to the Speaker’s health care bill. As the bill comes to the House floor, how many Democrats will stand up and vote against a health care bill that raises taxes, cuts benefits to seniors, and spends money that families and small businesses across America cannot afford?

 ”Life as you have known it…will cease to be” if this health bill passes, says Andrew Napolitano

Sources: Pelosi, Dems lock up 218

Hours before an expected vote on a sweeping health care bill, House Democrats believe they’ve secured the 218 votes they need to approve the bill, several party insiders said.

Thirty-two Democrats have publicly declared their opposition to the bill, giving party leaders the narrowest possible margin to push the bill across the finish line. But numerous sources said Democrats believe they do have the votes after a day of intense lobbying of wavering Democrats

Votes have a tendency to shift in the final hours before a controversial vote, but party leaders were expressing more genuine confidence as the sun set over the Capitol than they had exhibited all week. Word started spreading around 5 p.m. that leaders had the votes they needed to pass the $1.2 trillion bill.

But she and her top lieutenants earlier stopped short of saying they had the 218 votes needed for passage – signaling a day of vote-wrangling and arm-twisting that could stretch into Saturday night.

And Pelosi spokesman Nadeam Elshami declined to comment. “We are not commenting on whip counts,” Elshami said. 

 

Nancy Pelosi is still dealing as vote nears

The fate of the bill itself rests on the shoulders of a new generation of Democrats whose young careers will be defined, in part, by the votes they cast Saturday — votes sure to be used against many of them in 2010.

Freshmen Reps. Jared Polis of Colorado and Gerry Connolly of Virginia, for instance, organized their fellow freshmen to ask the speaker to raise the income threshold for the so-called “millionaire’s tax” to ensure small business owners wouldn’t bear the burden for reform.

Added Andrews: “Every member was given real input into the bill. This is pretty rare. Normally, the chairman writes the bill, and the whip goes out and gets the votes.”

But Pelosi’s not there yet, as she acknowledged Thursday — saying she’ll have the 218 votes by the time she needs them. Last-minute flare-ups on abortion and immigration Thursday threatened to complicate the bill — but at this point didn’t seem enough to derail it.

Members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus fought back against reports that leaders would add Senate language to block illegal immigrants from participating in the insurance exchange. New York Rep. Nydia Velazquez, the chairwoman of CHC, said they told the president during a White House meeting Thursday afternoon that the caucus has 20 votes for the current immigration language and would oppose the verification requirements in the Senate bill. Obama was receptive to their concerns, she said

And a small group of anti-abortion Democrats, led by Indiana Rep. Brad Ellsworth, continued haggling over the final language to ensure federal funds can’t be used to pay for abortions under programs created by the bill.

The speaker won support for the bill Thursday when AARP and the American Medical Association both announced they were backing the House bill.

Their support proved important enough for President Barack Obama to make a surprise appearance in the White House briefing room to tell Congress that it ought to heed the two powerful lobbies.

Obama himself will come to Capitol Hill on Friday to make a personal pitch to House Democrats. The president’s audience includes first-year Democrats from often-overlooked parts of the country who came to Congress on Obama’s coattails, like Reps. John Boccieri from northeast Ohio, Kathleen Dahlkemper from northwest Pennsylvania and Thomas Perriello from Virginia’s Southside. Their votes are critical to his success, just like his voters were critical to theirs.

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1109/29214_Page2.html

 

The Democrats’ $1.5 Trillion Fraud

“The current leadership has rigged the legislation so that 60 percent of its total cost will not be made public by the CBO in advance of the House vote,” reveals Cato director of health policy Michael F. Cannon. In an article at National Review Online, Cannon explains how they did it and provides an estimate of the hidden costs.

 

Call your Representative to tell them to vote NO for H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act.

Current Positions

Supporting: 187 Opposing: 203 Position Unknown: 46

Current Positions

http://call.seiu.org/9/HouseHealthReform/totals?

SEIU is keeping track too.  Hmmmm…… they see it dying I hope it does this is not good for America!  KILL THE BILL!!

UPDATED: Whip count on health bill

By The Hill Staff - 11/07/09 03:42 PM ET

Below is a list of selected Democrats and their positions on the House healthcare reform bill based on media accounts, press releases and spokesmen for the lawmakers.

UPDATED 11/7/09 3:42 p.m.

YES OR LEANING YES
Howard Berman (Calif.)
Leonard Boswell (Iowa)
G.K. Butterfield (N.C.)
Steve Cohen (Tenn.) Called the measure “America’s bill”
Gerry Connolly (Va.) Had expressed concern about tax provisions in initial bill
Jim Cooper (Tenn.)
Henry Cuellar (Texas) Got tort provisions added, though still wary of costs
Kathy Dahlkemper (Pa.)
Sam Farr (Calif.)
John Garamendi (Calif.) Was sworn in this week
Gabrielle Giffords (Ariz.) Leaning yes, would like to see more on tort reform
Debbie Halvorson (Ill.)
Alcee Hastings (Fla.)
Paul Hodes (D-N.H.) Firm yes; Hodes running for Senate
Steve Kagen (Wis.)
Marcy Kaptur (Ohio) Leaning yes
Dale Kildee (Mich.)
Ron Kind (Wis.) Voted no in Ways and Means Committee
Jim Langevin (R.I.) Opponent of abortion rights
Brad Miller (N.C.)
Dennis Moore (Kan.) Was target of death threat last summer over healthcare reform
Bill Owens (N.Y.) Was sworn in this week
Jared Polis (Colo.) Voted no in Education and Labor Committee
Earl Pomeroy (N.D.) Voted no in Ways and Means Committee
Nick Rahall (W. Va.)
John Salazar (Colo.)
Linda Sanchez (Calif.) Missed votes this week due to illness but will register yes on health bill
Rep. Joe Sestak (Pa.) Firm yes
Mark Schauer (Mich.) NRCC quickly pounced on Schauer’s support of bill
Dina Titus (Nev.) Voted no in Education and Labor Committee
Paul Tonko (N.Y.) Leaning yes
Tim Walz (Minn.) “I think we’re getting there.”
Diane Watson (Calif.) Praised bill in speech on the floor
Peter Welch (Vt.)

NO OR LEANING NO
John Adler (N.J.) A firm no, saying bill doesn’t do enough to control health costs.
Jason Altmire (Pa.)
Brian Baird (Wash.) Believes leadership should allow more GOP amendments
John Boccieri (Ohio) Leaning no, citing cost-containment concerns
Dan Boren (Okla.) A firm no
Allen Boyd (Fla.) “It simply falls short when it comes to lowering healthcare costs.”
Bobby Bright (Ala.)
Travis Childers (Miss.) “We need to get this legislation right, not just get it fast”
Jim Costa (Calif.)
Artur Davis (Ala.) Gubernatorial candidate says, “We risk a disaster if we get this wrong.”
Lincoln Davis (Tenn.) Wants changes to abortion-related provisions
Parker Griffith (Ala.) “I cannot support this bill.”
Bart Gordon (Tenn.) Science panel chairman is a no, citing public option and bill’s “financial impact on the state of Tennessee.”
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (S.D.) “It does not include sufficient cost-containment and deficit reduction measures.”
Larry Kissell (N.C.) Firm no
Suzanne Kosmas (Fla.)”As the bill stands right now, I am not going to be able to support it,” Kosmas told the Orlando Sentinel.
Frank Kratovil (D-Md.) Firm no
Jim Marshall (Ga.) A firm no
Eric Massa (N.Y.) Announced his opposition on Friday night
Jim Matheson (Utah)
Mike McMahon (NY) New York Daily News reported Friday evening he is planning to vote no.
Charlie Melancon (D-La.) No; Melancon running for Senate
Walt Minnick (Idaho) Has bucked leadership on big-ticket bills
Glenn Nye (Va.)

Stephanie Herseth Sandlin D-SD  Unfortunately, the House bill misses a critical opportunity to address access, quality and costs on the one hand, and solidify our fiscal future on the other hand

Ike Skelton (Mo.) Ag chairman cites public option, concerns about rural providers
Bart Stupak (Mich.) Wants changes to abortion-related provisions
John Tanner (Tenn.) “I am unable to support this legislation in its present form.”
Gene Taylor (Miss.) Made it clear to constituents this summer he is a “no.”
Harry Teague (N.M.) Skeptic of public option

UNDECIDED/REVIEWING BILL
Melissa Bean (Ill.)
Marion Berry (Ark.) Wants more aggressive action against HMOs, drug makers
Rick Boucher (Va.) Wary of public option; voted no in Energy and Commerce Committee
Dennis Cardoza (Calif.)
Yvette Clarke (N.Y.)
Joe Donnelly (Ind.)
Chet Edwards (Texas) A perennial GOP target; rejected climate bill
Keith Ellison (Minn.)
Bob Etheridge (N.C.) May run for Senate
Bill Foster (Ill.) “Encouraged” House is moving forward; voted no on climate bill
Bart Gordon (Tenn.) Republicans targeting Science panel chairman
Raúl Grijalva (Ariz.) Wants vote on “robust” public option
Baron Hill (Ind.) 
Dennis Kucinich (Ohio) He said he “will have trouble voting for anything other than robust public option.”
Daniel Lipinski (Ill.) Opposes abortion rights 
Dan Maffei (N.Y.)
Betsy Markey (Colo.) Has concerns with cost of the bill
Harry Mitchell (Ariz.)
Patrick Murphy (N.Y.)
Glenn Nye (Va.)
Jim Oberstar (Minn.)
Solomon Ortiz (Texas) Voted no on climate change bill
Ciro Rodriguez (Texas) Voted no on climate measure
Loretta Sanchez (Calif.) Has gone from “yes” to undecided
Heath Shuler (N.C.)
Adam Smith (Wash.)
Zack Space (Ohio) Voted yes on Energy and Commerce Committee
Betty Sutton (Ohio)
Peter Visclosky (Ind.)

By Eric Zimmermann - 11/07/09 02:41 PM ET

Fifteen Democrats joined a unanimous Republican caucus in voting against a procedural measure to begin debate on healthcare reform.

Most of the Democrats who voted “no”–listed below–are Blue Dogs who reperesent centrist or conservative districts.

But Democrats did manage to scrap together 242 votes in favor of taking up the legislation, meaning that at least some Democrats who have announced their opposition to the bill itself still voted in favor of considering it.

Here are the Democrats who voted against proceeding with debate:

Rep. Jason Altmire (D-Pa.)
Rep. Brian Baird (D-Wash.)
Rep. Dan Boren (D-Okla.)
Rep. Bobby Bright (D-Ala.)
Rep. Travis Childers (D-Miss.)
Rep. Artur Davis (D-Ala.)
Rep. Parker Griffith (D-Ala.)
Rep. Frank Kratovil (D-Md.)
Rep. Jim Marshall (D-Ga.)
Rep. Charlie Melancon (D-La.)
Rep. Walt Minnick (D-Idaho)
Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D-Calif.)
Rep. Heath Shuler (D-N.C.)
Rep. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.)
Rep. Gene Taylor (D-Miss.)

 Democratic defections come in face of last-minute push

After months of teetering on the fence as to whether to support their party’s healthcare bill, several Democrats have broken out against the reform legislation in racing toward a vote.

Reps. Eric Massa (N.Y.), Frank Kratovil (Md.), Jim Matheson (Utah), Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (S.D.), Larry Kissell (N.C.), Suzanne Kosmas (Fla.), Walt Minnick (Idaho), Harry Teague (N.M.), and Mike McMahon (N.Y.) have all bucked their party’s leadership and announced their opposition to the bill, on which debate began in the House on Saturday.

Read more

Committee Confirms – Comply with Pelosicare OR GO TO JAIL

From the House Ways and Means Republicans:

1-jail-cell

Today, Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI) released a letter from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) confirming that the failure to comply with the individual mandate to buy health insurance contained in the Pelosi health care bill (H.R. 3962, as amended) could land people in jail.  The JCT letter makes clear that Americans who do not maintain “acceptable health insurance coverage” and who choose not to pay the bill’s new individual mandate tax (generally 2.5% of income), are subject to numerous civil and criminal penalties, including criminal fines of up to $250,000 and imprisonment of up to five years.

In response to the JCT letter, Camp said:  “This is the ultimate example of the Democrats’ command-and-control style of governing – buy what we tell you or go to jail.  It is outrageous and it should be stopped immediately.”

Key excerpts from the JCT letter appear below:

H.R. 3962 provides that an individual (or a husband and wife in the case of a joint return) who does not, at any time during the taxable year, maintain acceptable health insurance coverage for himself or herself and each of his or her qualifying children is subject to an additional tax.” [page 1]

- – – – – – – – – -

If the government determines that the taxpayer’s unpaid tax liability results from willful behavior, the following penalties could apply…” [page 2]

- – – – – – – – – -

Criminal penalties

Prosecution is authorized under the Code for a variety of offenses.  Depending on the level of the noncompliance, the following penalties could apply to an individual:

• Section 7203 – misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.

• Section 7201 – felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.” [page 3]

When confronted with this same issue during its consideration of a similar individual mandate tax, the Senate Finance Committee worked on a bipartisan basis to include language in its bill that shielded Americans from civil and criminal penalties.  The Pelosi bill, however, contains no similar language protecting American citizens from civil and criminal tax penalties that could include a $250,000 fine and five years in jail.

“The Senate Finance Committee had the good sense to eliminate the extreme penalty of incarceration.  Speaker Pelosi’s decision to leave in the jail time provision is a threat to every family who cannot afford the $15,000 premium her plan creates.  Fortunately, Republicans have an alternative that will lower health insurance costs without raising taxes or cutting Medicare,” said Camp.

According to the Congressional Budget Office the lowest cost family non-group plan under the Speaker’s bill would cost $15,000 in 2016.

Live Pulse The Latest :

 STATE OF PLAY – STILL A VERY TOUGH SITUATION FOR DEM LEADERS: Late last night (AP alerted at 11:53 p.m.), House Democratic leaders caved to pressure from anti-abortion Democrats by granting them a vote on an amendment that would bar insurance companies from covering abortion under the exchanges. It’s another bitter pill for liberal Democrats, but party leaders are gambling that it will be just the breakthrough they need to get to 218. At least 23 Democrats have come out against the bill, giving Speaker Nancy Pelosi a buffer of 17 votes. But there could easily be another 20 Democrats in the “lean no” category, not to mention the broad universe of undecided lawmakers. So Pelosi and her team essentially need every undecided vote and four or five “lean no”s. That’s a difficult dynamic for any party at any time, but the election results and unemployment rates that just eclipsed 10 percent don’t help. President Obama will try to push the undecideds into the “yes” column when he addresses the caucus at 11:25 a.m. today. After all, few rank-and-file House members have the conviction to say “no” to their party’s president. And Obama’s morning visit makes it likely that the vote will come today because Democratic leaders wouldn’t bring in the big gun unless they were ready to fire. Not to mention that losing such a crucial vote on Obama’s signature issue would make the failure in Copenhagen look smalltime.

 

OUTRAGE: Democrats abuse power and reject debate on healthcare bill

Make sure you’re sitting down…

Folks, if this video doesn’t make it clear that Democrats in Congress will do ANYTHING needed to pass through their corrupt legislation, even if it means blatantly abusing their power… nothing will.

 

 

 

The plan also expands Medicaid, the federal-state health program for low income people. It also requires employers to offer insurance to their workers or face penalties.  “What Speaker Pelosi showed us today is that the majority in Congress will not govern out of fear but will lead with conviction,” declared Any Stern, president of the 2.1 million member Service Employees International Union. “The chorus of ‘no we can’t’ from the insurance industry, special interests and Republicans will not stand in the way of the change demanded in November.”   This is tyranny!   This is also from the site of Socialist and Communist party now opened up as peoplesworld.org.  If you don’t believe me, on the home page of this site, is the calender showing this:  

Nov13

Chicago: The Marxist Discussion Center public forum kick-off event: “Capitalism – the real story”: Is Capitalism itself to blame for the…

Nov08

New York City: Teach-in, Close U.S. military bases in the Pacific: The Granny Peace Brigade presents its fourth

Live Pulse: House : Inside the Obama caucus meeting

November 07, 2009
Categories:

Inside the Obama caucus meeting

President Barack Obama reminded wavering House Democrats on Saturday that voting against the health care bill won’t insulate them from Republican attacks.

In a last-minute appeal in the Cannon House Office Building, the legacy-conscious president focused the bulk of his 30-minute remarks on the historic impact of the vote, comparing this reform push to the establishment of Social Security and Medicare – and reminding them that both were demagogued by critics who predicted they would eventually lead to the country’s collapse.

“Remember why you got into politics in the first place and when you do, remember we can’t afford to let this moment pass,” Obama said, according to the notes of one attendee.

“A year ago, we were elected to change the country,” Obama told a roomful of House Democrats, according to the note of one person in attendance. “You guys have met the call on every single challenge.”

In listing their legislation they have passed to this point, the president told them, “You did this without any help from the other side,” complaining Republicans have been “saying ‘no,’ stopping progress, gumming up the works was their preferred strategy.”

“Are we going to stop now, or push forward?” Obama asked.

“Push forward,” a dozen or so Democrats shouted back.

“I’m absolutely confident we’ll get this thing done,” Obama told the group. “And when I’m in the Rose Garden signing a piece of legislation to give health care to all Americans, we’ll look back and say that was our finest moment.”

Posted by Patrick O’Connor 01:54 PM
November 07, 2009
Categories:

House passes rule

The House just passed the rule that will let them move forward with the debate 241-192. Here’s a list of Dems who voted no:

Jason Altmire
Brian Baird
Dan Boren
Bobby Bright
Artur Davis
Charlie Melancon
Gene Taylor
Travis Childers
Parker Griffith
Jim Marshall
Walt Minnick
Ike Skelton
Heath Shuler
Loretta Sanchez
Frank Kratovil

w/ Jon Allen

 

KILL THE BILL   CALL:
Freshman Rep from VA Gerald Connolly (202) 225-1492 22003
 
Source: www.freedomproject.org
With Speaker Pelosi set on forcing a vote as early as today on her 2,032-page, $1.3 trillion (and counting) health care takeover, experts on the Joint Economic Committee (JEC) produced an updated chart outlining the mind-numbing complexity of the more than 100 new bureaucracies Democrats want to imp…
Source: camp.house.gov
Ranking Member of the House Ways and Means Committee Dave Camp (R-MI) released a letter from the non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT) confirming that the failure to comply with the individual mandate to buy health insurance contained in the Pelosi health care bill (H.R. …
GOP Rep Virginia Fox excoriates the “exercise of tyranny by the majority.” Dingell rules her out of order.

November 07, 2009

Cooper will vote yes Moderate Dem Jim Cooper will vote yes on the bill to move it forward. He said in a statement:

I will vote yes on H.R. 3962. My vote is not an endorsement of all the provisions of the bill because I find much of the bill to be deeply flawed. There is little chance that H.R. 3962 will become law due to the long legislative process. My reason for voting yes is to advance the cause of health care reform by forcing the Senate to act. Without passage of this House bill, the Senate could delay reform indefinitely. That would be the worst possible outcome because our current health-care system is not sustainable. Congress needs to pass good health legislation in the next few months for the good of the country.

 

Kaptur wil vote yes if Stupak passes

Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-Ohio) says she’ll vote for the bill if Stupak’s amendment is adopted but remains undecided if it fails.

“I hope that won’t happen,” she said.

Jon Allen

Live Pulse: House : The rules and doc fix

November 07, 2009
Categories:

The rules and doc fix

The House is voting on the rules that will set the debate for the health care bill. Included are rules that would also set the debate for the doc fix, which Democrats have introduced separately from the health reform bill. The House is not expected to take up the $214 billion doc fix today, but the rules clear the way for lawmakers to vote when they’re ready.

Included in the rules is a provision that would add PAYGO to the doc fix should it pass. The move is designed to force the Senate to consider PAYGO, which would set into law a requirement that spending legislation be fully paid for.

But neither PAYGO nor the doc fix have garnered much support in the Senate as of late.

 

Posted by Chris Frates 01:16 PM
November 07, 2009
Categories:

Rahm: Not “necessary” to attend floor vote

As a former member, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel has House floor privileges, which he could use to strong-arm lawmakers during what’s expected to be a tough health care vote today.

But he says his former colleagues shouldn’t expect to see him on the floor.

“I don’t think that’ll be necessary,” Emanuel told PULSE early Saturday afternoon.

Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson, a former Wisconsin governor, angered lawmakers by twisting arms on the floor during a three-hour Medicare prescription drug law in 2003.

Sensitive to perceptions of inappropriate lobbying by the administration on the floor, then-White House trade negotiator Rob Portman, a former House member from Cincinnati, stood just outside the chamber with his BlackBerry during a critical 2005 vote on the Central America Free Trade Agreement.

By Jonathan Allen

 

But then  Obama came how does that not seem like inappropriate lobbying by the President.  This interfers with the proper debate on behalf of the People of the United States.

Lawmaker reax to Obama meeting

Rep. Joe Crowley (D-N.Y.) said Obama was upbeat and emphasized the historic nature of of Saturday’s vote rather than talking about specifics of the legislation.

I find this very disturbing in a over 2000 page bill that will destroy the Health Industry and finish Bankrupting America and also giving more power to the Government.  Remember they already have 30% of our other industries, Finance, Banking, Mortgage, Auto Companies and now they are going for Health.  This is UNCONSTITUTIONAL by so many levels.  KILL THIS BILL!

“He just talked about how this was a big moment in history, how you will look back in your lives and this will be the finest, proudest moment of your career,” Crowley said.

Crowley said he thought Obama may have shifted some undecided Democrats into the “yes” column.

“I think there were a number of folks in there moved by what [Obama] said, no question about it,” Crowley added.

Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.), a leader of the Progressive Caucus, said she agreed with Obama’s view that this debate “was a major moment in time. As Democrats, it’s very important that we don’t waste it.”

“What he just said was a nice cap for all of us, that’s he’s with us and knows how important this is, and he’s knows it’s a real stretch for some people” Woolsey said.

John Bresnahan

FLOOR ACTION — GOP working to scuttle attempts to proceed

The House is almost out of order, Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) said as he presided over the House Saturday morning.

Republicans have openly admitted Democrats they have the votes to pass health care overhaul legislation but some GOP lawmakers are hatching floor tactics that will delay movement on the bill.

Members of the minority are trying to scuttle attempts to proceed with the bill by objecting to unanimous consent requests from Democrats to speak outside the rules of debate.

Reps. Tom Price (R-Ga.), Pete Sessions (Texas), Dan Burton (Ind.) and Louie Gohmert (Tex.) are leading the charge, constantly objecting to Democrats’ attempts to speak outside the rule to extend and revise remarks on health care overhaul.

Dingell, who presided over the House’s debate of the Medicare bill in 1965, seems to be getting restless, turning down Republican objections. Rules Chairman Louise Slaughter (D-N.Y.) eventually yielded time to the Republicans.

There’s also some talk on the Republican side of putting up enough present votes to deny Democrats adoption of Rep. Bart Stupak’s (D-Mich.) amendment to prevent federal funding of abortions. That probably won’t happen because they’ll want to vote for the abortion restriction, but if they choose to pull out all the stops to create disorder, it could.

By Jake Sherman and Jonathan Allen

CEOs: Public option will cost businesses

The Masters of the Universe are consolidating their lobbying forces in response to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s announcement that the health care bill will include a public option.

Members of Business Roundtable, a consortium of high-profile CEOs, held a conference call Wednesday to publicly rip the public option.

“The public plan has, in our view, many problems,” said John Castellani, the group’s president. “It will likely simply shift, rather than reduce, costs and will stifle the innovation that we need to continue improving our health care system.”

Castellani said the public, or government-run, plan will transfer health care coverage costs to private payers and “will likely reimburse providers at a sub-market rate, forcing private plans to compensate by paying higher rates.”

“The government does not have a good record on managing costs,” said Antonio Perez, CEO of Eastman Kodak.

Business Roundtable has been called “the most influential chief executive lobbying group in the U.S.” Its members employ roughly 12 million people and provide health insurance for “more than 35 million people,” according to the group’s estimates.

Verizon Chairman Ivan Seidenberg warned against the negative effects of the public option on current health care plans and their beneficiaries.

“We don’t want to take the 175 million people that are getting insurance through their employers and throw them out the window,” Seidenberg said.

Markham Heid

MoveOn continues targeting moderate Dems

MoveOn surveyed its members and found that 93 percent would not support their senator for re-election if they help Republicans block a vote on health reform. In Nebraska and Arkansas the number was also 93 percent and in Louisiana, the number was 89 percent. The results are intended as warning shots to Sens. Ben Nelson, Blanche Lincoln and Mary Landrieu, respectively.

MoveOn members that have donated to Nelson and Lincoln’s campaigns will deliver letters to their offices today saying that they will not support their re-elections if they block an up-or-down vote on reform.

“MoveOn members are intensifying our efforts to press Senators not to stand in the way of reform. And we will continue to work with progressive leaders in both chambers to make sure that the bill that lands on the President’s desk includes a robust public option available everywhere, makes certain that healthcare is affordable for working families and covers those most in need,” said MoveOn’s Justin Ruben.

Read the email to supporters after the jump.

» Continue reading MoveOn continues targeting moderate Dems

MoveOn has praise and a warning

MoveOn has praise for the opt-out, but foreshadows the intra-party fight to come among liberal and conservative Democrats.

“A handful Conservative Democrats are threatening to join with Republicans to block an up-or-down vote on a healthcare bill,” wrote executive director Justin Ruben. “MoveOn members are intensifying our efforts to press these Senators not to stand in the way of reform. And we will continue to work with progressive leaders in both chambers to make sure that the bill that lands on the President’s desk includes a robust public option available everywhere, makes certain that healthcare is affordable for working families and covers those most in need. ”

By including the opt-out in the bill, Reid can argue that he has done all he can to push through a strong public option. Now, the onus is largely on liberal groups to deliver 60 votes it needs to pass — a high bar indeed. 

Full MoveOn statement after the jump.

» Continue reading MoveOn has praise and a warning

 

Source: www.heritage.org
The massive congressional health care bills would raise health care costs, undermine consumer choice and quality of care, and trample on the traditional role of the states. The wisdom of the Founding Fathers was evident in recognizing the inherent limits of political power and in constitutionally d…
Source: republicans.waysandmeans.house.gov
According to analysis from the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) the number of illegal immigrants covered under Speaker Pelosi and House Democrats’ health care bill (H.R. 3962) has increased by 2.5 million from their original bill, H.R.

Trackback URL

Post a Comment